Why there are no cases here yet
Real failure investigations involve client components, plants and commercial situations. Publishing them requires written clearance, careful anonymisation and technical review. We would rather show you an honest empty page than an invented case — the same standard of honesty you should expect in our reports.
Case examples are not included until anonymised candidates are approved. No named organisations, operators, assets or quoted customer statements are included.
What an MTIS case lesson will look like
| Component class | e.g. heat-exchanger tubes, pump shaft, pipework weld — anonymised, no client or plant identifiers |
|---|---|
| Decision context | restart / repair-or-replace / recurrence / supplier-quality question |
| Evidence examined | what was received, preserved and tested — in-house and partner-lab |
| Mechanism found | confirmed or most-likely, stated with its evidence |
| Root cause | the why behind the mechanism |
| Action taken | the corrective and preventive change the client could implement |
| The lesson | the transferable point for readers with similar equipment |
Meanwhile
The Failure Investigation page shows exactly how we work, and Insights carries fifteen practical technical notes you can use today — including what to preserve when something fails.